Banner
Banner
Banner
Click Here For the Official Online Shop of Major League Baseball
Banner
Baseball Awards from Crown Awards
Banner
Puma_English_Banner_234x60_10_19_06

Latest News

The Padres have avoided arbitration by agreeing to deals with Headley, Hundley, Stauffer, Baker, Thatcher, Quentin, Volquez, Venable, and Gregerson.  Only two players still unsigned are Clayton Richard and Dustin Moseley

Blogger Spotlight

Check out our "On the Farm" for info regarding the Padres minor leagues.  Click here to view the Padres top 30 Prospects for 2012.

Friarhood Chapters

If you are a Padres fan and live outside of San Diego you are not alone!  Check out our Friarhood Chapters, and find other Padres fans in your area.

Learn More

Announcer critics detract from padres winning ways PDF Print E-mail
Voice of the Fan - Visitors Pass
Written by Mickey Koke   
Wednesday, 02 June 2010 12:36
Sharing is Caring

Dick Enberg

I understand that Dick Enberg may rub some Padres fans the wrong way, or may just not be the preference of the new age trendy style play-by-play hype men that were popularized by ESPN. Enberg is a true professional and in my opinion, these mini-diatribes (aimed towards BOTH Dick Enberg and Mark Grant) from bloggers and on twitter, from the casual and die hard fans alike, have sunk to a new low.

Recently, Jay Posner asked Mr. Enberg about the criticism that he's been receiving on the web and throughout the blogging-sphere. The criticism primarily being that Enberg gets too excited for the opposing team. Whether it be when the opposing team comes up to the plate and he talks about their talented ballplayers, or to his homerun call, "Touch 'Em All" or his at times monotonous "Oh my!"

"Hmmm," Enberg said, "I find that a real compliment."

"I'm complimented that somebody feels that way," he said. "If you got 100 of those to one the other way, then I'm doing something wrong. But you have to balance it."

Maybe he is saying that he is not going to let that criticism bother him because he does not fancy being a homer, and the criticism is a compliment because that is exactly what he does not want to be.


Enberg, before the season, stated that he would not be a "Homer" announcer; that he would work on his craft and do his due diligence and call the game fairly and how he saw it. Now, Dick Enberg fumbles some calls, some players names, and has delayed calls on homerun shots that make it a bit awkward and hard to get excited as a fan, when the announcer doesn't know what's happening. Having said that, he is obviously rusty. Enberg has not broadcasted this game (that at times is very fast paced) for a few decades. One of the other things that is vastly different is the internet age. The way that people now can communicate is unreal. The unbelievable use of Twitter and Blackberry, along with the blogging-sphere, really allows things to drop publicly so quickly and in so many ways it is fantastic for people to be connected. What it also does has allowed the critics/fans their own play-by-play or platform to critically dissect every gaff, every miscue, critiquing every bit of their dialog or call ad nauseam.

 

 

I have been guilty of this as a die hard and very passionate Padre fan. I was one of the more critical fans of Mark Grant in years past, and have often been too harshly critical and probably even unfair. Having said that, Grant has toned down what I have in the past characterized as his "schtick." I believe Grant has been very professional this year and it has been a treat to hear him chime in along with Enberg and his analysis. Mark seems much more at ease now in contrast to in the beginning of the year, yet seems to still have freedom to be himself and be the lovable goofy "color" analyst. I give Mark Grant a lot of credit for working hard at improving his craft.

One of the many differences in the booth I have noticed are the suits - love it! The professionalism, complimented by some humor and witty banter between Enberg and Grant, do not totally distract you from the game. I also believe the difference this year, that I absolutely love, is the camera not focusing too often on the crowd or the booth. In years past, often pitches were missed because the camera/production crew were focusing too much on the announcers and the crowd, and not enough on baseball. This year that is not the case. At the end of the day, I really like the pairing of Dick Enberg with Mark Grant, and think they bring out the best in each other! Hey, we are all critics, I just think that the complaining about the announcers is getting out of control. The Padres are in first place and playing some of the best baseball throughout the majors. Many fans seem to be focusing on complaining about a certain call, or a minor mistake by either one of the announcers. Maybe it's time to look in the mirror and be happy at what they (Grant and Enberg) do bring and what we do enjoy about them. This is Baseball! It's supposed to be fun and I believe some of the joy and excitement is being taken away by unwarranted cynicism.

I am happy we have a pro like Enberg in the booth. I can live with his uncomfortable calls and his repetitious coin phrases. If he calls the game as he sees it for both teams, even when the opposing team hits a homerun, it is never going to be something a Padre fan wants to hear. I have listened a lot to Vin Scully, who I would regard as the best broadcaster of all time. I would never try to compare him to anyone. Mr. Scully is in a league of his own. I hear a very fair and even poetic called game from him, because hey, who is going to be critical of the master! While he gets excited when the other team hits a homerun, I don't know if I hear many people, criticizing him for showing some excitement for the other team.

Bottom line, I want to enjoy the game and, while the announcers make mistakes, (like we all do) Enberg and Grant have worked well together, and I have enjoyed this year's broadcast very much.

Go Friars!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments  

 
+1 # briankoke 2010-06-02 21:40
God forbid Enberg be impartial in the booth. Some fans had judged the man before he had done one Padres game. These are the same people making these ridiculous comments and they're the same people who have pointed out every little mistake Enberg has made since the beginning of the year. One thing is for sure... Padres games are much more enjoyable to watch this year in contrast to last year.
 
 
# AvengingJackMurphy 2010-06-03 09:47
I disagree with the title of your article.
 
 
-1 # mickeykoke 2010-06-03 10:20
Quoting AvengingJackMur phy:
I disagree with the title of your article.


Which is fine. I could have also use (for me, for my OP) "distract".

What do you disagree with in particular about he article title?
 
 
# AvengingJackMurphy 2010-06-09 20:20
I just don't think that the criticism of the booth has any correlation to the awesomeness on the field.

There are some things I like about Enberg (voice, professionalism , knowledge of baseball history, disdain for the wave)and it doesn't really bother me too much when he butchers names.

I'd like to see him dial back the enthusiasm for the opposition a little bit. Doing so will not make him a cheerleader or a homer.
 
 
+1 # 2010-06-03 10:59
I live in SF, and watch almost all my games on MLB TV and the bulk of those I do while doing something else, so the sound is usually off. But when I do have the sound up, I really don't understand the criticism. He misses some calls (like calling an HR when it is not, etc) but it is fine. I like Vasgersian the best. Quick witted and good play by play but [censored] is fine.
 
 
-1 # matthewverygood 2010-06-03 13:47
I don't care about the impartiality. What I really cannot stand are the countless and extremely awful mistakes. Calling players by the wrong names, horrible home run calls, etc. I've said this time and again dating back to last year when he did football. He is too old, can't see, and shouldn't be broadcasting anymore.

Oh, and he also completely snaked Neely's job. He is not a class act.
 
 
# briankoke 2010-06-03 14:16
I'll take honest mistakes over unprofessional behavior in the booth any day of the week.

"Snaked Neely's job"

The Padres went to Enberg. Not the other way around. If someone offers you a job that's attractive to you, would you be thinking about the person you might be replacing? It's not like Neely was fired. He's still working for the big league rather than working for some minor league affiliate.
 
 
-2 # matthewverygood 2010-06-03 18:49
Believe what you want about who approached who, but it's well-known in the San Diego media community that Enberg stole Neely's job.

And in any case, his "honest mistakes" might be just that, but his performance is still terrible and is showing no signs of improvement.
 
 
# briankoke 2010-06-03 19:51
"Believe what you want about who approached who, but it's well-known in the San Diego media community that Enberg stole Neely's job."

If it's so well known in the media community than you wont have a problem proving me wrong. Feel free to provide any evidence that supports your claim.

"And in any case, his "honest mistakes" might be just that, but his performance is still terrible and is showing no signs of improvement."

His mistakes don't go unnoticed by me and they even bother me from time to time. Having said that, I still enjoy listening to Padres games more than ever before.
 
 
# 2010-06-03 14:28
I will take overt impartiality over "All we need is four runs to win the game" homerism any day. Ideally, I like my team's announcer(s) to be just slightly partial to the home team, but not cheerleaders. It's only natural for an announcer,after thousands of games (dozens in the case of football) to develop an affinity for the team they follow. But the best announcers find a balance between homer and impartial announcer.
 
 
+2 # Tjpadfan 2010-06-03 16:13
From the ;itle I have heard of Enberg I have found him a good play-by-play man and someone who has elevated the padres brodcast.

He's a keeper.
 
 
# 2010-06-08 04:02
When Enberg's hiring was announced, we were thrilled. Now we wish he would go away. He makes so many errors on play by play, cannot pronounce many names of players, especially Latino names. He calls the warning track the warning path, continually uses the phrase "giving ground" when an outfielder is simply chasing a fly ball and the "action pitch" characterizatio n of a pitch with a two and one count is annoying. And I could go on and on, but won't, at this time. Bring back Neely, give Bob Scanlan a shot, give Enberg a long vacation, or how about an outright release.
 
 
+1 # AussiePhil 2010-06-20 22:00
For the most part [censored] has been pretty good. Now obviously he makes mistakes, everybody does, usually he is pretty quick to correct himself. Mud makes mistakes as well but its part of being an announcer, you never get it right all the time. His pairings with both mud and tony have been great and i love the professionalism shown in the both is fantastic.

In regard to [censored]'s quirks for example "warning path" "action pitch" "touch em all" these are all just different phrases in the baseball world. Just because you don't use them doesn't mean that he is wrong, just different. All announcers use different idioms and expressions that mean the same thing. Its what makes them special. i think everyone should lay off our announcers and just focus on the games instead of the broadcast.
 
 
# mickeykoke 2010-06-21 10:25
I agree with you a 100%! Well said.
 
 
+1 # 2010-07-24 07:16
I've been a [censored] Enberg fan from the days of Air Coryell, when he teamed with Merlin Olsen and covered the AFC as the primary broadcasters on NBC. He has always been a professional, adds an air of reverence for whatever sport he covers, as opposed to broadcasters who think they are bigger than the game. I think we are blessed to have him, even though he is clearly in the twilight of is career. God bless you Mr. Enberg!
 
 
# mickeykoke 2010-07-27 16:36
NIce, I couldn't agree with you more!
 
 
# 2010-09-04 08:51
The Friars are fortunate to have a seasoned pro like [censored] Enberg. [censored] Enberg is not a "homer". Which makes me more appreciative of play by play announcers such as [censored] Enberg and the late Lakers announcer Chick Hearn.In that they were critical, objective, and telling the game like it is. Obviously, [censored] Enberg wasn't hired to appease the "homer" Padres fans.
 

Friarhood Member Log in

Log in to leave your comments



Community Log In

Welcome to the Congregation                

Join Us on Facebook

Friarhood Newsletter

Friarhood on XTRA Sports 1360

Banner
Pitchers and Catchers Report 02/19/2012 07:00am 11 Days


Banner

Who's Online

We have 169 guests and 1 member online
  • M_Rennick